My story is in the June-July 2012 issue of Old House Journal. They had been following my story since the beginning and contacted me a few months back for an interview. Much thanks to Clare for contacting me and writing the story, and for all the support I've gotten from their online community. I am still in the housing diversion program. However, the city has been much more supportive of my restoration. They have been quite positive about the work I am doing on my house and the impact that it has on the community and market values of surrounding homes. I should have the rest of my house stripped and coated by the end of this work season. Again, I want to thank everyone for their support.
Here is the story from Old House Journal:
Restoration in Violation?
by Clare Martin
Nina Smith thought she was doing the right thing when she bought a 1914 Foursquare in Lakewood, Ohio, and carefully began stripping off its aluminum siding to restore the original clapboards underneath. So a few months into the project, she was understandably surprised when she received a notice from the local building department to maintain her siding. Despite attempts to cooperate with the authorities (while still taking the time to properly strip, repair, prime, and paint the original clapboards), Smith has found herself in the midst of a protracted court battle to fend of criminal charges of noncompliance levied by the building department.
Smith admits her case is somewhat extreme, provoked by a harassing neighbor and a building department with a less-than-stellar reputation. Still, it's not uncommon for DIY restorers to run up against local governments during the restoration process.
If you're restoring a property that's been vacant or is particularly derelict, check your city's property maintenance requirements to make sure those items - which can include things like peeling paint, sagging gutters, missing shingles, and rotting eaves - go to the top of your to-do list to avoid being dinged for a violation by a neighbor or building inspector.
Most homeowners know to check whether permits are required before beginning repairs, and to follow all regulations and approvals mandated by local historic preservation commissions. However, keep in mind that permits may require the work to be performed within a certain time limit, though extensions are often possible if you can show progress (though in Smith's case, her careful prep work has repeatedly been met with claims from the inspector that "prep work doesn't equal progress"). Many homeowners are able to get around time-limit restrictions for exterior work by completely restoring one side of a building at a time, but Smith points out this probably wouldn't have helped her.
"This all started when I only had siding removed from the front of the house," she says. "I honestly have no idea what I could have done to prevent this from happening." For more on Smith's story, visit 1914foursquare.com.
Sounds like the City is getting on board with your project! That's fantastic. Nice write up, too. Sorry you had to go through this, and be "the example." You're showing some strength and perseverance here!ReplyDelete
I hope things are settling down with the neighbor and the city and you can get on with the job in relative peace. I've been following your trials and tribulations on My Old House Online, but hadn't visited the blog before. Looking forward to reading more.ReplyDelete
Do you mind іf I quote а couple of уour articleѕ aѕ lοng as I proviԁe crеdіt and sources back tο your weblog?ReplyDelete
My blog sitе іs in the exаct ѕamе niche as уourѕ and my viѕіtorѕ wοuld сertainly benefit from somе of the infoгmаtion you
provide here. Please lеt me knoω іf this alright with you.
Thanks a lоt!
Also visit my webpage ; home repair
That's fine by me. Good luck.Delete